Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 29,31,364 made by treating bank cash deposits as unexplained income by estimating profit in a money transfer business is sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined the material on record including bank statements showing cash deposits followed by immediate transfers, the stated business model that the account was used for third-party money transfer transactions, and the fact that commission per transaction had been offered to tax. The Tribunal noted that identical modus operandi and commission determination had been accepted in earlier assessments in respect of the person conducting the transfer business. The Tribunal found the commission rate of Rs. 40 per transaction to be reasonable and supported by the transaction pattern evidenced in the bank statements, and observed that the assessee had declared commission income corresponding to the transactions.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 29,31,364 is not warranted and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.