Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment framed under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 without issuance of a notice under section 143(2), after the assessee filed a belated return in response to a notice under section 142(1) during the pendency of assessment proceedings, is valid.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined whether a return filed belatedly but during the pendency of assessment proceedings retains the character of a valid return and whether the Assessing Officer is required to issue a notice under section 143(2) before proceeding to frame a scrutiny assessment. The Tribunal considered statutory provisions including sections 142(1), 139(4), 143(2), 144 and 234A, and relevant precedent, concluding that a return filed in response to a notice under section 142(1) during the pendency of assessment is a valid return notwithstanding delay and that the Assessing Officer remains under a statutory obligation to issue a notice under section 143(2) to assume jurisdiction for scrutiny assessment. The Tribunal further held that the deeming provision in section 292BB cures defects in service of notice but does not cure complete absence of a statutory notice; therefore non-issuance of section 143(2) notice is a jurisdictional defect rendering the assessment under section 144 unsustainable.
Conclusion: The assessment framed under section 144 without issuance of notice under section 143(2) is invalid and is quashed; decision is in favour of the assessee.