Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2026 (1) TMI 1517 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Point-to-point passenger transport is not tour operator service; extended limitation fails where facts were already known to revenue. Point-to-point passenger transport under a tourism arrangement was held not to constitute tour operator service because the activity involved ordinary ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Point-to-point passenger transport is not tour operator service; extended limitation fails where facts were already known to revenue.

                          Point-to-point passenger transport under a tourism arrangement was held not to constitute tour operator service because the activity involved ordinary transport, not planning, organising or operating a genuine tour within the statutory definition. Service tax on that basis was therefore unsustainable. CENVAT credit on service tax paid for third-party insurance of buses used in exempt stage carriage operations was denied because input service credit is unavailable for exempt or non-taxable output services. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable since the relevant facts were already within the department's knowledge, and suppression or wilful misstatement was not established.




                          Issues: (i) Whether operation of buses from point to point under the stated tourism arrangement amounted to tour operator service and attracted service tax; (ii) whether CENVAT credit of service tax paid on third party insurance of buses used for exempt stage carriage services was admissible; (iii) whether the extended period of limitation was invocable on the facts of the case.

                          Issue (i): Whether operation of buses from point to point under the stated tourism arrangement amounted to tour operator service and attracted service tax.

                          Analysis: The definition of tour operator under section 65(115) of the Finance Act, 1994 covered planning, scheduling, organising or arranging tours and, after amendment, operation of tours in a tourist vehicle or contract carriage covered by a permit other than a stage carriage permit. The activity in question was found to be ordinary point-to-point transportation of passengers, with fares collected by the appellant and only a token amount passed to the tourism corporation. The arrangement did not show a common tour planning or organising activity of the kind contemplated by the statutory definition. The reasoning was aligned with the view that mere passenger transport without a common tour contract is closer to transport service than tour operation.

                          Conclusion: The demand of service tax on tour operator service was not sustainable and was set aside.

                          Issue (ii): Whether CENVAT credit of service tax paid on third party insurance of buses used for exempt stage carriage services was admissible.

                          Analysis: Credit is not available where the input service is used for providing exempt or non-taxable output services. The buses were used for undisputedly non-taxable stage carriage operations, and the insurance related to those buses. On that basis, the service tax paid on the insurance premium could not be treated as eligible CENVAT credit for the appellant.

                          Conclusion: The denial of CENVAT credit on third party insurance of buses was upheld.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the extended period of limitation was invocable on the facts of the case.

                          Analysis: The appellant was a Government organization and the dispute involved activities already within the revenue's knowledge through prior proceedings, audits, and returns. In such circumstances, the ingredients of suppression of facts or wilful misstatement were not established. The principle applied was that once the department is aware of the relevant facts, the extended limitation period cannot be invoked merely by repeating the same or similar allegations in later notices.

                          Conclusion: The extended period of limitation was not available to the Revenue and the appellant succeeded on limitation.

                          Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded in part, with the service tax demand on tour operator activity and the disputed extended-period demands set aside, while the credit disallowance and the unresolved normal-period liabilities were left to be worked out by the adjudicating authority.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Point-to-point passenger transport without a genuine organised tour arrangement does not constitute tour operator service, and the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked where the relevant facts were already within the department's knowledge.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found