Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent could validly charge and recover interest on delayed payment of GST from the petitioners where the respondent failed to issue the tax invoice within the statutory period and remained responsible for payment of GST.
Analysis: The Court examined the statutory framework under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, including the obligation of a supplier to issue a tax invoice within thirty days of supply, the requirement to file returns and pay tax within the prescribed period, the relevance of particulars to be contained in the tax invoice, and the statutory provisions regarding penalty for non-issuance of invoice and interest for delayed payment of tax. Applying these provisions, the Court found that the respondent, as the supplier/lessor, bore the legal responsibility to issue the invoice and to pay GST within the statutory time; failure to issue the invoice and to discharge the tax liability could not be converted into a lawful basis to shift interest liability onto the petitioners.
Conclusion: Held in favour of the petitioners (assessee). The respondent is directed to refund Rs. 3,94,98,383/- recovered towards interest and to pay interest at 18% p.a. if refund is not made within six weeks; respondent may recover the amount from the responsible official.