Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether incentives/discounts/reimbursements received by an authorised vehicle dealer from vehicle manufacturers under performance-based schemes constitute consideration for a declared service (Business Auxiliary Service) and are liable to service tax.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined whether the payments characterized as incentives/discounts arose from a business transaction where the dealer purchased vehicles on a principal-to-principal basis and resold them, or whether such receipts were consideration for providing services to the manufacturers. Prior decisions of the Tribunal addressing identical factual and legal questions were considered, applying the principle that amounts forming part of the sale transaction between manufacturer and dealer (granted on the basis of sales performance and reflected as discounts/incentives) are not payments for services. The settled authorities concluded that such receipts are commercial adjustments to the sale price in principal-to-principal transactions and not consideration for Business Auxiliary Service. In view of those authorities, further consideration of limitation was unnecessary.
Conclusion: The impugned demand of service tax on incentives/discounts/reimbursements is set aside and the appeals are allowed; no service tax is leviable on such receipts (decision in favour of the assessee).