Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the final assessment orders passed after completion of DRP proceedings under section 144C(13) are barred by limitation and therefore without jurisdiction, having regard to the interplay between section 144C and section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined whether section 144C constitutes a self-contained code that excludes the time-limits in section 153 or whether the timelines under section 153 operate as an outer limit applicable on remand/DRP proceedings. The Tribunal considered the Madras High Court decision in Roca Bathroom Products P. Ltd., which held that sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and that the outer time limits in section 153 (including section 153(2A)/(3)/(4) as applicable) govern remand/DRP proceedings; it noted the statutory timelines within section 144C (including provisions for draft order, filing of objections, DRP directions and finalisation) and the non-obstante language, but followed the reasoning that DRP proceedings form continuation of assessment and must be completed within the outer limitation prescribed under section 153. The Tribunal also addressed and rejected the Revenue's contention to defer hearing because of pending references in the Supreme Court, andon the meritsfound that the dates in the appeals showed final orders were passed beyond the applicable limitation period determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153.
Conclusion: The final assessment orders passed beyond the period of limitation calculated with reference to section 144C read with section 153 are without jurisdiction and are quashed; the appeals are allowed in favour of the assessee.