Revocable trust treatment under income tax law affirmed for a securitisation structure with pass-through taxation.
A securitisation trust was treated as a revocable transfer under sections 61 to 63 because its deed allowed revocation by the Security Receipt Holders with re-transfer of the trust fund, and a collective or conditional mechanism was sufficient for section 63. As a result, the trust could not be assessed as an Association of Persons, section 164 did not apply, and the special charging scheme displaced that approach. The structure was also held to operate as a pass-through arrangement, so the income was not taxable in the hands of the trust but in the hands of the Security Receipt Holders.
Issues: (i) Whether the securitisation trust was a revocable trust within the meaning of sections 61 to 63 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether the trust could be assessed as an Association of Persons and whether section 164 applied; (iii) whether the income of the trust was taxable in its own hands or in the hands of the Security Receipt Holders.
Issue (i): Whether the securitisation trust was a revocable trust within the meaning of sections 61 to 63 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The trust deed provided a mechanism for revocation of contributions by the Security Receipt Holders, with re-transfer of the trust fund and extinguishment of the security receipts on revocation. The statutory expression "revocable transfer" is wide and does not require unilateral or unconditional revocation. A collective or conditional mechanism for re-transfer is sufficient to attract section 63.
Conclusion: The trust was held to be revocable within the meaning of sections 61 to 63 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (ii): Whether the trust could be assessed as an Association of Persons and whether section 164 applied.
Analysis: The trust was constituted under the securitisation framework and not by persons voluntarily joining together in a common enterprise. There was no common volition or joint management among the Security Receipt Holders, and the beneficiaries were identifiable with reference to the trust deed and contribution records. Once the transfer was held revocable, the special charging scheme under sections 61 to 63 displaced the attempt to apply section 164.
Conclusion: The trust could not be assessed as an Association of Persons and section 164 was inapplicable.
Issue (iii): Whether the income of the trust was taxable in its own hands or in the hands of the Security Receipt Holders.
Analysis: The statutory scheme and the governing trust deed treated the securitisation structure as a pass-through arrangement. Consistent co-ordinate bench decisions on identical trust deeds had already held that such income is not assessable in the hands of the trust.
Conclusion: The income was not taxable in the hands of the trust and was taxable in the hands of the Security Receipt Holders.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, the deletion of the addition was sustained, and the trust's pass-through treatment was affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under sections 61 to 63 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a trust deed containing a structured right of revocation and re-transfer creates a revocable transfer even if revocation is collective or conditional, and such a securitisation trust cannot be taxed as an Association of Persons or under section 164 when the beneficiaries are identifiable.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
