Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the impugned order-in-original dated 3rd April, 2024 (passed on ground of non-prosecution) is vitiated by non-service of the show cause notice and reminders where the notices were uploaded under the "Additional Notices" tab on the GST portal, resulting in denial of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Analysis: The petition challenges the mode of service consisting of uploading the show cause notice and reminders under the "Additional Notices" tab which, on the material before the Court, was not open or accessible to the petitioner and therefore did not impart knowledge of the proceedings. The matter is considered in the context of interlocutory rulings of this Court (Neelgiri Machinery) and subsequent authorities which treat non-communication by such upload as affecting the entitlement to a hearing. Having regard to those decisions and the absence of effective service here, the petitioner was deprived of an opportunity to file a reply and to seek personal hearing before adjudication; the impugned order was passed on the sole ground of non-prosecution without affording that opportunity. The Court therefore considered remand to permit filing of reply, grant of personal hearing, and fresh reasoned adjudication by the authority.
Conclusion: The impugned order-in-original dated 3rd April, 2024 is quashed and set aside; the petitioner is permitted to file a reply within four weeks and to seek personal hearing on the fixed date, and the adjudicating authority is directed to pass a reasoned order after personal hearing within three months.