Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional power under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was validly exercised where the assessment order allowed Chapter VI-A deductions against capital gains and other income, and whether the Tribunal was right in sustaining the revision while directing a fresh consideration on part of the issue.
Analysis: The assessment was found to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue because the Assessing Officer had allowed deductions under sections 80IA, 80HHC and 80-O beyond the profits of the eligible business, including amounts attributable to capital gains. The Court held that the existence of both statutory conditions for exercise of revisional power under section 263 was satisfied. It further held that the Tribunal's view, which upheld the revision on the core issue but modified the direction and remitted the matter for proper consideration on the remaining income-related claim, accorded with the law.
Conclusion: The exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 was upheld, and the assessee's challenge failed.