Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order cancelling the petitioners GST registration dated 12.09.2025 should be quashed and set aside on the ground that the petitioners reply dated 13.08.2025 (filed on the GST Portal) was not considered, warranting remand for fresh decision after providing opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The petition challenges the cancellation order passed under Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 pursuant to a show-cause notice issued in Form GST REG-17 and relying upon a confidential communication. The material on record shows that the petitioner filed a reply with supporting documents on 13.08.2025 through the GST Portal. The impugned order does not record any findings addressing or appreciating the explanation and documents furnished by the petitioner. The statutory scheme and procedural fairness require that a reply to a show-cause notice and supporting material must be considered and an opportunity of hearing provided before a decision to cancel registration is finally taken. The absence of any recorded consideration of the petitioners reply vitiates the order and necessitates fresh consideration by the authority. All contentions of the parties were kept open for reconsideration by the authority.
Conclusion: The cancellation order dated 12.09.2025 is quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the Superintendent, Range III, Ahmedabad for passing a fresh order after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing; fresh order to be passed within 12 weeks. The conclusion is in favour of the assessee.