Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the final assessment order and demand notice passed by the Assessing Officer without considering objections filed by the assessee before the Dispute Resolution Panel (and without the AO receiving a copy of those objections) is liable to be quashed for breach of the assessee's right to be heard under Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Court examined the faceless assessment scheme under Section 144C, the procedural requirement in Section 144C(2)(b) that the assessee must forward a copy of objections to the Assessing Officer, and the operation of Section 144C(4) enabling the AO to proceed where no objection is received by him. The Court recognised that under the faceless regime the AO may reasonably infer non-filing if he does not receive a copy of objections, but also noted that the statutory scheme envisages automatic deferral and consideration by the DRP when objections are filed. The Court observed that in the present case the objections were factually filed before the DRP but were not sent to the AO, resulting in the AO passing the final order and demand without hearing the assessee or awaiting DRP's view, thereby producing an adverse consequence to the assessee.
Conclusion: The impugned final assessment order and the demand notice dated 18.12.2025 are quashed and set aside; relief is granted in favour of the assessee.