Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the GST paid on supply, installation, testing and commissioning of the fire-fighting system and public health engineering for expansion/commissioning of a new factory is eligible as Input Tax Credit or is blocked under Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the CGST/TNGST Acts; and whether the secondary question on timeline to avail ITC on the advance component requires separate adjudication.
Analysis: The Appellant sought ITC contending the installations constitute "plant and machinery" (apparatus, equipment or machinery) used for making outward supply and/or are movable. The provisions governing entitlement and restrictionsSection 16(1) (entitlement subject to conditions and restrictions) and Section 17(5)(c) & (d) (blocking ITC on works contract services and goods/services for construction of immovable property other than plant and machinery)and the definition of "plant and machinery" (apparatus, equipment and machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support and used for making outward supply) are determinative. The contractual scope ('deliver the Permanent Work to the owner') and the cost-abstract show a composite works contract for supply and installation integrated into the factory infrastructure. Applying established tests (nature/object of annexation, intention of parties, functionality, permanency and marketability), the Authority finds the installations become assimilated into the building and serve permanent beneficial enjoyment of the immovable property; several components are tailor-made and not marketable independently. Even where items may be detachable physically, the contract and the manner of integration indicate they form part of immovable property and are not "plant and machinery" for the purposes of Section 17. Given this conclusion, the ITC is blocked under clauses (c) and (d) of Section 17(5). As the primary query is answered against ITC eligibility, the question on timeline for availing ITC on the advance component is rendered academic and need not be answered.
Conclusion: The GST paid on supply, installation, testing and commissioning of the fire-fighting system and public health engineering for the new factory is not eligible as Input Tax Credit and is blocked by Section 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST/TNGST Acts; appeal dismissed (in favour of Revenue).