Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Customs Authorities must delete the petitioner's name from the Customs Broker Licence Management System (CBLMS) profile of his former employer/respondent no. 3 following the petitioner's resignation and communications indicating no objection.
Analysis: The Court examined the petitioners resignation, the communication dated December 10, 2025 from the Assistant Commissioner calling upon respondent no. 3 to submit the CBLMS cancellation application within seven days, and the subsequent letter dated December 31, 2025 from the Kolkata Customs Authorities to the CBLMS authorities at Mumbai requesting deletion of the petitioners name. The respondent no. 3 did not appear despite service. On the basis of the recorded communications and absence of any objection from the Customs Authorities or respondent no. 3, the Court found no justification for retaining the petitioners name in the CBLMS profile of respondent no. 3 and directed the Customs Authorities to delete the name expeditiously.
Conclusion: The Customs Authorities are directed to release the petitioner from the CBLMS profile of respondent no. 3 and delete the petitioners name from that profile preferably within two weeks from the date of communication of the order; the writ petition is disposed of.