Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment framed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by an Assessing Officer who did not himself issue the notice under section 143(2) is invalid and vitiated for want of jurisdiction and mandatory compliance of notice requirement.
Analysis: The Court examined the sequence where the notice under section 143(2) was issued by a different Ward (non-jurisdictional AO), the assessee objected to the jurisdiction and requested migration, and the assessment was ultimately framed by ITO Ward 9(3) without issuing a fresh notice under section 143(2). The Tribunal applied the principle that issuance of the section 143(2) notice by the AO who ultimately frames the assessment is a mandatory pre-condition and that absence of such jurisdictional notice by the AO who completes assessment renders the process defective. The Tribunal relied on and followed precedent of a coordinate bench dealing with identical facts, which held that assessments framed by the AO without issuing the requisite section 143(2) notice are nullities and liable to be quashed. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that transfer of jurisdiction within the same city is solely administrative and does not affect the mandatory notice requirement.
Conclusion: The assessment framed under section 143(3) without issuance of notice under section 143(2) by the AO who framed the assessment is quashed; decision is in favour of the assessee.