Reopening of income-tax assessment under Section 147 quashed where approval under Section 151 was mechanical and lacked application of mind

Validity of reopening under section 147 is contested where approval for reassessment is perfunctory. The note approving reopening merely stating fitness without application of mind was treated as mechanical approval, invoking precedent that mechanical approvals vitiate reassessment. Prior authority condemning one-word or formulaic approvals as lacking deliberation was applied. Reopening founded on such non-meaningful approval was held invalid and the consequent reassessment proceedings were quashed, with the operative factual trigger being information about cash deposits in the assessee's bank account.

---

---

Issues: Whether the approval under section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was mechanical and without application of mind, thereby vitiating the reopening under section 147 (notice under section 148) and mandating quashing of the reassessment proceedings.

Analysis: Information of cash deposits prompted the Assessing Officer to reopen assessment under section 147 by issuing notice under section 148. The record of approval under section 151 by the competent authority consisted of a perfunctory endorsement (e.g., "Yes, it is a fit case for the notice u/s 148"), indicating no application of mind. The Tribunal, following authoritative high court decisions which treated such brief/ritualistic endorsements as mechanical and thus invalid, examined the approval proforma and found the same pattern of non-application of mind. On that basis the statutory safeguard in section 151 was not properly exercised and the prerequisite for valid reassessment under section 147 was lacking.

Conclusion: The approval under section 151 was mechanical and vitiated the reopening under section 147; the reassessment proceedings are quashed and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.

---