Penalty u/s 270A challenged where estimation-based addition and silence on statutory limb led to deletion of penalty.

Penalty under penal provision for reporting discrepancies was set aside because the impugned addition arose solely from an income estimation by the assessing officer and therefore falls outside the scope of under-reporting when the books are otherwise correct and complete to the AOs satisfaction; additionally, the penalty proceedings were procedurally defective as the notice and assessment failed to specify which limb of the penalty provision (under-reporting or mis-reporting) was invoked, rendering initiation of penalty proceedings untenable and resulting in deletion of the penalty.

---

---

Issues: Whether the penalty levied under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained where the Assessing Officer made additions on an estimated basis and the assessment order and section 274 notice did not specify the specific limb of section 270A under which penalty proceedings were initiated.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined whether the addition was made on an estimated basis and whether such estimated additions fall within "under-reporting of income" for the purposes of section 270A, having regard to the exclusion in section 270A(6)(b), and whether the penalty proceedings were valid when both the assessment order and the notice under section 274 read with section 270A failed to specify the precise limb of section 270A(2) or section 270A(9) under which penalty was initiated. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer did not disturb contract receipts but applied an estimated net profit rate to arrive at the addition, and that identical factual circumstances in coordinate-bench decisions resulted in deletion of penalty where the specific limb was not indicated.

Conclusion: The penalty under section 270A is unsustainable and is deleted; the assessee's appeal is allowed.

---