Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amounts representing employees' share of contribution deposited by the employer to welfare funds (ESI, PF etc.) after the statutory due date are to be disallowed and treated as deemed income of the employer under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The legal framework comprises Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Checkmate Services Private Limited (reported). The decision holds that employees' contributions are monies held in trust by the employer for employees and that deposit to relevant welfare funds on or before the statutory due date is a condition precedent to entitlement to deduction; if deposited beyond the statutory due date specified in the respective labour enactments, such amounts are to be treated as deemed income of the employer. The Supreme Court's ruling is binding on subordinate forums under Article 141 and is applicable retrospectively where no prospective limitation is specified. The admitted facts record delayed deposits of employees' contributions beyond the statutory due dates; therefore, the statutory condition for deduction is not satisfied and the amounts must be added back as income.
Conclusion: The addition treating delayed payment of employees' contributions as deemed income is upheld; the assessee is not entitled to deduction under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 43B.