Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the DGAP report finding profiteering against the Respondent should be accepted and whether the Respondent is liable to pay the quantified profiteered amount of Rs. 67,02,147/- along with interest to the eligible homebuyers as per applicable law.
Analysis: The DGAP report quantified the amount of profiteering at Rs. 67,02,147/-. The Respondent has undertaken to pay that quantified amount and sought three months' time to effect payment to numerous homebuyers. The representative of the DGAP raised no objection to the undertaking. The applicable statutory framework for payment of interest on amounts directed to be refunded is Rule 133(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017, which prescribes the interest liability in cases of profiteering refunds. The proceedings therefore address (a) acceptance of the DGAP's quantified determination of profiteering, (b) a timeline for payment to eligible recipients, and (c) application of interest as per the statutory provision.
Conclusion: The DGAP report is accepted; the Respondent is directed to pay Rs. 67,02,147/- to eligible homebuyers within three months and to pay interest as applicable under Rule 133(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017; the Respondent must submit a compliance report to the jurisdictional Commissioner after completion of payments.