Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs.50,50,000/- made as unexplained investment under section 69 and sustained by the lower authorities is liable to be deleted where the assessee filed a revised return in response to notice under section 148 which was e-verified and no statutory notice under section 143(2) was issued before framing assessment under sections 143(3)/147.
Analysis: The assessment was reopened under section 147 and an assessment order under sections 143(3)/147 was passed without taking into account the revised return filed by the assessee on 30/10/2018. The revised return was produced before the Tribunal and shown to be e-verified by Aadhaar OTP, supported by an affidavit certifying its genuineness. The assessment was framed on the premise that the revised return was not e-verified. Further, no statutory notice under section 143(2) was issued for assuming jurisdiction to frame the assessment. The Tribunal considered the statutory framework governing reassessment, the requirement of valid verification of returns, and the need for statutory notices where applicable, and applied these principles to the facts that the revised return was available, e-verified, and was not considered by the assessing officer before making the addition under section 69.
Conclusion: The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs.50,50,000/- and allowed the assessee's appeal; the assessment and the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were set aside in respect of the impugned addition.