Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned Show Cause Notice and consequential order which were uploaded on the portal but not physically served, and where no effective personal hearing notice was given, violated principles of natural justice requiring quashing/remand and a direction to grant opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The Court examined the factual record and found that the Show Cause Notice was not physically served on the petitioner and no effective notice for personal hearing was physically communicated, though the notice was uploaded on the portal. The Court considered relevant precedents addressing whether uploading on the portal suffices as service and whether failure to grant a personal opportunity to be heard amounts to breach of principles of natural justice. Applying those principles, the Court held that absence of effective service and absence of personal hearing notice deprived the petitioner of the chance to submit a response; accordingly the matter calls for restoration of the opportunity to be heard and a reasoned reconsideration by the authority.
Conclusion: The petition is partly allowed in favour of the assessee; the petitioner is permitted to file a reply within four weeks, the authority shall grant a personal hearing within two weeks thereafter and pass a reasoned order; the impugned orders are set aside to the extent they were passed without affording the opportunity to be heard and in violation of principles of natural justice.