Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the addition of Rs. 4,30,05,774/- representing the impact on profit due to a retrospective change in method of accounting for recognition of revenue should be sustained; (ii) (excluded) other grounds either not pressed, consequential or procedural were not substantively decided.
Analysis: The assessee changed the method of determining stage of completion from staff-cost-based measure to total-cost-based measure to comply with Accounting Standard (AS) 7 and reversed earlier years' revenue as a prior period item. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 4,30,05,774/- representing the profit impact of that change despite allowing the reversal of prior-year revenue. The Tribunal examined whether recognising the prior period reversal (allowed by the AO) and the consequent timing difference produced any tax loss to the revenue, noting the tax rate parity and absence of any deprivation of tax in subsequent years. Applying the principle that mere timing differences which do not result in a loss to the exchequer and where revenue has not been deprived are not to be subjected to separate taxation, and having regard to the precedent relied upon, the Tribunal concluded that making a separate addition for the profit impact was not warranted.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 4,30,05,774/- is deleted and the grounds challenging that addition are allowed in favour of the assessee.