Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Cash refund claim for pre-GST CENVAT credit not carried forward in TRAN-1, despite ST-3 classification mismatch, allowed</h1> Section 142(9)(b) CGST Act was interpreted to permit an assessee to seek cash refund of eligible pre-GST CENVAT credit even if it was not carried forward ... Entitlement for cash refund in view of Section 142(9)(b) of CGST Act - appellant had not carried forward the balance amount in TRANS-1 filed by them - figure mentioned in ST-3 Return and the relevant supporting documents did not match with each other - HELD THAT:- No objection can be taken on the ground that the appellant had not carried forward the amount of Rs.2,61,188/- in TRANS–I though the same has been shown as outstanding balance in ST-3 Return. In the case of the appellant decided by the Bangalore Bench vide Final Order dated 07.07.2021 [2021 (7) TMI 326 - CESTAT BANGALORE], the learned Member observed that if two options are available, the assessee may choose, which is more beneficial for them and, therefore, did not find any error where the appellant did not choose to carry forward the credit in TRANS-1 and preferred to claim cash refund as provided under Section 142(9)(b) of the Act. Discrepancy pointed out by the Department with reference to the supporting documents submitted by the appellant as against the ST-3 return - HELD THAT:- It is an admitted position that in the ST–3 Return, the CENVAT Credit accrued on account of inputs even in the revised returns filed on 19.09.2017, the supporting documents relates to credit of service tax paid on audit fee/input service. In the earlier case of the appellant disposed of vide Final Order dated 07.07.2021, it was noticed that the appellant had failed to furnish the original invoices which are necessary for verification of the claim of refund and, therefore, for the purpose of verification of the documents, the case was remanded back to the Original Authority. Thus, what emerges is that the appellant is required to substantiate the refund claim by submitting the requisite and correct documents - Tribunal agree with the Adjudicating Authority that the supporting documents were incompatible with the information mentioned in ST–3 Return, which were found to be mismatched. However, considering the fact that the appellant had the balance of Rs.2,61,589/- in their Cenvat Credit Account but by mistake had mentioned as towards ‘input’ in the ST-3 Returns though in the documents, it has been reflected as towards ‘input service’. The fact remains that the appellant had availed the cenvat credit and was therefore, entitle to claim the refund thereof. The error is not really very serious affecting the merits of the entitlement. Moreover, the appellant is a nationalized Bank and no malafides can be attributed except there has been some negligence on the part of some officer. The Authorities below have erred in denying the benefit to the appellant. The impugned order is set aside - appeal allowed. Issues: (i) Whether a registered person is entitled to cash refund under Section 142(9)(b) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 where a revised ST-3 return increases the closing balance of cenvat credit, despite mismatches in supporting documents and non-carriage of credit in TRANS-1.Analysis: Section 142(9)(b) provides for refund where a return filed under the existing law is revised after the appointed day and the closing balance of cenvat credit in the revised return exceeds that in the original return, entitling the registered person to claim the differential amount as cash refund under the existing law. The Tribunal examined whether documentary mismatches and the appellant's choice not to carry forward credit in TRANS-1 defeat entitlement. The factual record showed the cenvat credit was availed and the increased closing balance was reflected in the revised return. The Tribunal accepted that supporting documents did not perfectly mirror the ST-3 entries but found the discrepancy to be a clerical error concerning classification (input versus input service) rather than evidence of absence of credit or mala fide intention. Prior decisions applying Section 142(9)(b) were followed, and where verification requires original documents the matter can be remanded for substantiation; however, on the present facts the appellant had sufficiently established entitlement to the credited amount.Conclusion: The appellant is entitled to the cash refund of the differential cenvat credit under Section 142(9)(b) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017; the impugned order denying the refund is set aside and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found