Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a single composite assessment order covering more than one tax period was sustainable under the Goods and Services Tax law.
Analysis: The order was challenged on the ground that a single assessment order had been passed for multiple years. The Court relied on the view that a single show-cause notice or a single composite assessment order cannot be issued for more than one tax period, and that separate proceedings are required for each assessment year where the annual return due date has been reached.
Conclusion: The composite assessment order was not sustainable and was set aside, along with the appellate order, with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year.
Ratio Decidendi: A single show-cause notice or composite assessment order cannot validly cover multiple tax periods where separate assessment proceedings are required for each tax period or assessment year.