Maintenance support, training, and software service payments under India-Singapore DTAA "make available" test held not taxable as FTS

The dominant issue was whether receipts from maintenance support, education and training, and software-related transactions under the India-Singapore DTAA were taxable in India as fees for technical services by satisfying the "make available" test under Article 12(4)(b). The ITAT held that the Revenue bears the burden to establish that the services enabled the payer to apply technical knowledge independently, and found that neither the AO nor the DR adduced evidence showing the "make available" condition was met; relying on co-ordinate bench decisions (including in the assessee's own case), it treated the receipts as not taxable as FTS. The AO was directed to delete the addition and the assessee's ground was allowed.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

(i) Whether the objections alleging (a) breach of principles of natural justice by the dispute resolution panel and (b) violation of consistency/judicial discipline warranted interference with the assessment.

(ii) Whether receipts from maintenance support services and education/training services connected with software licences were taxable in India as fees for technical services/fees for included services under the applicable treaty provision, particularly in the absence of evidence that the services "make available" technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue (i): Natural justice; consistency/judicial discipline

Legal framework (as discussed by the Court/Tribunal): The Tribunal addressed the assessee's objections that it was not given a proper opportunity and that prior years' positions should bind the tax authorities, but emphasised that in taxation each year is a separate assessment year and there is no res judicata.

Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal found, on the record, that adequate opportunity had been provided and availed. It further held that assessment can be made in accordance with the facts of the relevant year, and that the objections on natural justice and consistency, as raised, did not warrant relief in the present adjudication.

Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the grounds based on alleged violation of natural justice and the rule of consistency/judicial discipline.

Issue (ii): Taxability of maintenance support and education/training receipts as FTS/FIS; "make available" requirement

Legal framework (as discussed by the Court/Tribunal): The Tribunal considered the treaty provisions dealing with taxation of technical services/fees for included services and the "make available" condition. It also proceeded on the basis that the revenue had accepted that the sale of software itself was not taxable as royalty for the year under consideration.

Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal found that the maintenance support, other related services, and education/training services were "intricately and inextricably associated" with the software and were provided in connection with utilisation of the software. On that footing, and since the underlying software receipts were accepted as not taxable as royalty, the Tribunal held that the receipts from such related and inextricably linked services could not be treated as taxable FTS/FIS. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that the services did not satisfy the treaty "make available" clause, and held that the burden lay on the revenue to demonstrate satisfaction of that condition. As neither the assessing authority nor the departmental representative brought evidence to substantiate that "make available" was met, the Tribunal rejected taxation of these receipts as FTS/FIS.

Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the receipts from maintenance support and other related services and from education/training services were not taxable as FTS/FIS for the year, directed deletion of the corresponding addition, and allowed the assessee's ground on this issue.

---