Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid on delayed disbursement of enhanced compensation for acquired land formed a revenue receipt liable to tax deduction at source, and whether the demand raised under the Income-tax Act could be sustained.
Analysis: Interest received on delayed payment of compensation was treated as income distinct from the compensation itself. The settled position applied was that such interest is a revenue receipt and falls within the charging provisions of the Income-tax Act. The characterization of the underlying land as agricultural did not alter the taxability of the interest component. On that basis, deduction at source under the relevant provisions was held to be applicable, and the demand raised by the revenue authority was not shown to be illegal or arbitrary.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the petitioner and in favour of the revenue; the interest component was held taxable and liable to tax deduction at source.