TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the appeal under the GST law could be rejected solely for non-filing of a hard copy when it had been filed electronically within limitation. (ii) Whether the appeal could be rejected for non-submission of a certified copy of the impugned order when the order had already been uploaded on the GST portal.
Issue (i): Whether the appeal under the GST law could be rejected solely for non-filing of a hard copy when it had been filed electronically within limitation.
Analysis: Section 107 permits an appeal to be filed in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner. Rule 108 contemplates filing of the appeal in FORM GST APL-01 electronically or otherwise as may be notified, and does not make hard copy filing a mandatory condition in the facts presented. The appeal had been filed on the portal within the prescribed time and the authorities did not show any notification requiring a separate hard copy. A procedural requirement could not be used to defeat a substantive right of appeal where the appeal was otherwise timely and duly instituted.
Conclusion: The rejection of the appeal for non-filing of the hard copy was unsustainable and was in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the appeal could be rejected for non-submission of a certified copy of the impugned order when the order had already been uploaded on the GST portal.
Analysis: The judgment treated the later amendment to Rule 108 as removing the requirement of filing a certified copy where the impugned order is already available on the portal. Since the order dated 02.06.2021 had been uploaded and the appeal had been filed against that uploaded order, rejection on the ground of absence of a certified copy was viewed as a hyper-technical objection. The appellate process was required to be handled in a manner that advances justice rather than frustrates it on procedural formalities.
Conclusion: The rejection of the appeal for non-submission of the certified copy was unsustainable and was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned appellate rejection was set aside and the appeal was directed to be heard afresh on merits after giving an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An electronically filed GST appeal made within limitation cannot be rejected on purely technical filing defects when the governing rules do not make those defects mandatory in the circumstances and no prejudice is shown.
TaxTMI 
