Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to total waiver of pre-deposit in the classification dispute concerning steel tubular poles, and whether the goods were prima facie classifiable under Heading 73.08 as structures or under Heading 73.06 as tubes and pipes.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of the product and the effect of the prior Board circulars and judicial decisions. The materials showed that the goods were taper steel tubes used as telephone poles. The earlier circular treating steel tubular poles as classifiable under Heading 73.08 had been rescinded after the later circular accepted the view that such goods fell under Heading 73.06. The reasoning of the Apex Court and the Tribunal in the cited decisions indicated that the goods retained the character of tubes and pipes and did not become structures merely because they were used as poles. The claimed departmental acceptance of the assessee's later Tribunal order was not treated as sufficient to displace the contrary binding precedent.
Conclusion: Total waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The assessee was directed to deposit Rs. 30 lakhs and waiver was granted only for the balance demand and interest pending disposal of the appeal.