Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED
(i) Whether the benefit of taxation under section 115BAC (new regime) could be denied solely because Form 10-IE was not filed within the due date under section 139(1), where Form 10-IE was filed with a revised return and was available with the processing authority at the time of processing.
(ii) Whether, on the facts found (including a short delay attributed to technical glitches), the requirement of filing Form 10-IE within the due date was to be treated as directory rather than mandatory, so that the option under section 115BAC must be given effect.
2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS
Issue (i) & (ii): Denial of section 115BAC benefit due to belated Form 10-IE despite filing with revised return
Legal framework (as discussed by the Tribunal): The Court examined the assessee's exercise of option for the new tax regime under section 115BAC through Form 10-IE, and the filing of a revised return under section 139(5). The processing was done under section 143(1). The decisive factual aspect considered was that Form 10-IE and the revised return opting for section 115BAC were on record before the processing authority when the return was processed.
Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal recorded that the original return was filed under the old regime, and later a revised return was filed opting into section 115BAC along with Form 10-IE. Although the due date for Form 10-IE was 15.03.2022, the Form and revised return were filed on 24.03.2022, i.e., with a short delay of nine days, asserted to be due to technical glitches. The Tribunal found no dispute that Form 10-IE was actually filed and was available to the processing authority at the time of processing. It further found that denial was made only on the ground of late filing of Form 10-IE, and accepted the reasoning applied in coordinate bench decisions noted in the order that the filing requirement was directory in nature and compliance was sufficient if the Form was before the authority at the time of assessment/processing.
Conclusions: The Tribunal conclusively held that the benefit of the new tax rates under section 115BAC could not be denied merely because Form 10-IE was filed after the due date, where it was filed with the revised return and was available with the authority at the time of processing. The Assessing Officer/processing authority was directed to take cognizance of Form 10-IE and allow taxation under section 115BAC.