1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Interest on investor refund amounts-whether payable and how computed-clarification allowed before SAT; appeals dismissed with liberty.</h1> The dominant issue was whether clarification was warranted regarding the interest payable on refund amounts due to investors. The SC held that the SAT had ... Interest payment - Seeking correction/clarificationβββββββ - Claim for refund of the monies received from the investors - HELD THAT:- We find that the Securities Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai [βSATβ], in its judgment and order [2025 (11) TMI 532 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)], did not take note of certain aspects in relation to the interest payable by Gaekwad Plantations Ltd., the appellant herein. We grant liberty to the appellant to approach the SAT for seeking correction/clarification in that regard. Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed. Delay was condoned. The Court noted that the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai ('SAT'), in its judgment and order dated 01.09.2025, 'did not take note of certain aspects in relation to the interest payable' by the appellant. Liberty was granted to the appellant to approach the SAT to seek 'correction/clarification' on that limited issue. Subject to this liberty, the Court found 'no other reason to interfere with the impugned judgment/order' passed by the SAT in the referenced appeals. Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of.