Just a moment...
AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.
Launch AI Search →Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>SLP on limitation u/s153(2A) dismissed, confirming draft and final assessment orders were time-barred for revenue</h1> SC dismissed the revenue's SLP challenging the HC's decision on limitation under s.153(2A) regarding validity of the draft and final assessment orders. ... Validity of draft assessment order and final assessment order as barred by limitation u/s 153(2A) - Scope of the word “received” - Petitioner submits that similar matter has already been dismissed by this Court vide order [2025 (11) TMI 174 - SC ORDER] In view thereof, the present Special Leave Petition also stands dismissed. The Court first condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition (SLP), thereby treating the petition as properly before it on merits. Counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that a 'similar matter has already been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 03.11.2025 in SLP(C) No. 31681/2025.' Relying on the prior dismissal of the identically situated SLP, the Court declined to entertain the present petition. It held that, 'In view thereof, the present Special Leave Petition also stands dismissed.' No independent or distinct legal issue was identified that would justify a departure from the earlier decision in SLP(C) No. 31681/2025. As a consequence of the dismissal of the SLP, all pending interlocutory or ancillary applications in the matter were also brought to an end, the Court directing that 'Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.' The order thus rests on the principle of consistency with prior orders in substantially similar matters, without entering into a detailed examination of the merits.