Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty demand could be sustained on an export oriented unit that received raw materials duty free under Notification No. 22/2003-C.E. and, with prior departmental permission, returned surplus raw materials to the original supplier in accordance with Rule 6 of the Central Excise (Removal of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2001.
Analysis: The duty-free clearance was subject to Condition (6) of the notification, which required compliance with the procedure under the 2001 Rules. Rule 6 permitted return of surplus raw materials duty free to the original supplier. The return in question was made with prior departmental permission and in accordance with the notification conditions and the prescribed procedure. Condition (8) was held to be inapplicable where Condition (6) had been complied with.
Conclusion: The duty demand was not sustainable and the assessee succeeded.