Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appeal in PIL on alleged misleading financial safety ads dismissed for lack of bona fides and genuine public interest</h1> SC dismissed the appeal in a public interest litigation challenging allegedly misleading advertisement campaigns that were said to create a false ... Public interest litigation - Locus standi to approach the Court for redressal of violations of fundamental rights or genuine infractions of statutory provisions - Advertisements campaigns - Misleading, and create a false impression of assured financial safety - HC held that- ' prima facie not satisfied with the credentials of the Petitioner so as to warrant the entertainment of this Public Interest Litigation. No substantial public interest is found to be involved in the present petition. - accordingly dismissed ' - HELD THAT:- We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. Accordingly, dismissed. The Supreme Court, exercising its jurisdiction under Article 136, dealt with a Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a High Court judgment and order. The petitioner was permitted to 'appear and argue in-person,' indicating the Court's acceptance of self-representation but only as to the mode of hearing, not on the merits. After considering the matter, the Court stated it was 'not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court,' thereby affirming the High Court's decision without detailed reasoning or reappraisal of facts or law. Consequently, the SLP was 'dismissed,' and all pending interlocutory or connected application(s) were ordered to 'stand disposed of,' bringing the entire proceeding to a close.