Government grants for educational institute Phase 2 held capital corpus receipts, outside income u/s2(24), s.11(1).

ITAT Lucknow held that government grants received by the assessee-trust for setting up Phase 2 of an educational institute, involving specified projects and infrastructure creation, constituted capital receipts and formed part of the corpus, even though not expressly designated as such. These receipts did not fall within the definition of income under s. 2(24) and therefore could not be taxed as surplus over 15% under s. 11(1). The Tribunal ruled that there was no requirement to route such grants through the income and expenditure account or consider them for application-of-income computation. The order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition was upheld and the assessee's appeal allowed.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

1.1 Whether grants-in-aid received from a Government Ministry for setting up an educational institute, with specific directions as to their use, constitute capital/corpus receipts not forming part of "income" under the Act, or whether they must be treated as income to be routed through the income and expenditure account and subjected to the application/accumulation scheme under section 11.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

2.1 Character and taxability of Government grant-in-aid received by a registered charitable institution

2.1.1 Legal framework (as discussed)

2.1.1.1 The Tribunal considered the scheme of taxation of charitable trusts and institutions under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, including the requirement that receipts treated as income are to be applied to the extent of 85% for charitable purposes or otherwise accumulated in accordance with section 11(2).

2.1.1.2 The Tribunal referred to the definition of "income" under section 2(24) of the Act and evaluated whether the subject grants fell within this definition.

2.1.1.3 Reliance was placed on the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the matter of grants received from the Government for implementation of specified schemes, where such grants were held not to constitute income of the trust but to form part of its corpus.

2.1.2 Interpretation and reasoning

2.1.2.1 The assessee, a society registered under section 12A, received grants from a Government Ministry specifically "for meeting the expenditure towards setting up of the institute" (Phase 2) and for specified projects and facilities. The Tribunal treated these as grants for the creation and establishment of the institution itself.

2.1.2.2 On factual examination, the Tribunal noted that:
(a) The grants were sanctioned under letters of the Government Ministry specifying the purpose.
(b) A utilization certificate, duly certified by a Chartered Accountant, evidenced that the grants were utilized for the stated purposes within the prescribed time.
(c) The sums were credited directly to the balance sheet and not routed through the income and expenditure account.

2.1.2.3 The Departmental Representative contended that under section 11 all receipts of the trust had to be taken as income, placed on the receipts side of the income and expenditure account, and subjected to the 85% application requirement; and that, in the absence of an application for accumulation under section 11(2), the surplus over 15% was liable to tax.

2.1.2.4 The Tribunal rejected this approach by first determining the character of the receipts. It held that, since the grants were received "for setting up of the institute", they were "capital receipts", and therefore not "income" within the meaning of section 2(24). Consequently, they were to be treated as part of the corpus of the institution.

2.1.2.5 The Tribunal emphasized that where funds are received for a specific capital purpose integral to the setting up of the institution, such funds, by their very nature, form part of the corpus "whether specifically mentioned or not"; they are not revenue receipts and therefore not subject to the computation mechanism of section 11 for application/accumulation.

2.1.2.6 Applying the ratio of the cited High Court decision on Government grants for specified schemes, the Tribunal held that grants made available to implement a Government scheme in a particular manner cannot be treated as income of the trust. It regarded the present grants for setting up phase 2 of the institute as analogous, thereby attracting the same principle.

2.1.2.7 On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that:
(a) There was no legal necessity to route such capital/corpus grants through the income and expenditure account.
(b) Such grants did not fall to be considered for computing "application of income" for purposes of section 11.
(c) The Assessing Officer's treatment of the grants as income and computation of taxable surplus after allowing only 15% deduction under section 11(1) was misconceived.

2.1.3 Conclusions

2.1.3.1 Grants received from the Government Ministry specifically for setting up the institute and related capital projects are capital receipts, forming part of the corpus of the institution and not constituting income under section 2(24).

2.1.3.2 Such corpus/capital grants are not required to be brought into the income and expenditure account and are outside the purview of the 85% application requirement and accumulation provisions of section 11.

2.1.3.3 The addition made by treating the grant amount (after allowing 15% deduction) as taxable surplus was unsustainable. The order of the appellate authority deleting the resultant income computation was correct and was upheld.

2.1.3.4 The revenue's appeal was dismissed in full.

---