Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E. dated 14.11.2002 could extend to Additional Excise Duty, National Calamity Contingency Duty and Education Cess paid in cash, and whether the departmental circular or the Rajasthan High Court decision altered the effect of the Tribunal's earlier ruling.
Analysis: The refund mechanism in the notification was confined to the portion of excise duty paid in cash. The expression used in the notification was held to refer to excise duty under the Excise Act itself, and not to duties or cesses treated as excise duty by some other statutory fiction. The circular relied upon could not override the Tribunal's earlier detailed decision, and the Rajasthan High Court ruling was held not to deal with the precise issue decided earlier by the Tribunal, particularly the treatment of Education Cess under the notification. The issue was therefore treated as already concluded by the prior Tribunal order dated 12.08.2009.
Conclusion: The refund claim for Additional Excise Duty, NCCD and Education Cess was not accepted, and the matter was decided against the assessee.