Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported PVC suspension resin was classifiable under the specific tariff entry for poly(vinyl chloride) resins or under the residuary entry, and consequently whether the benefit of the customs exemption notification was available.
Analysis: The dispute turned on tariff classification of PVC suspension grade resin. The material had already been examined in earlier Tribunal and appellate decisions involving identical or substantially similar goods, where the specific heading for non-plasticized PVC resins was preferred over the general or residuary entry. Applying Rule 3(a) of the General Rules for the Interpretation of Import Tariff Schedule, the specific description was held to prevail over the more general description. Since the imported goods answered to the specific entry, the denial of exemption and the resultant demand could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under the specific tariff entry, and the impugned order denying the exemption and confirming duty was unsustainable.