1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal CESTAT rules in favor of appellant, setting aside service tax demand for specific period.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order related to service tax demand for the period ... Reverse Charges - The impugned demand in this case relates to the period 9-7-2004 to 16-6-2005. impugned order demanded service tax from assessee in respect of services received fro abroad. Held that - in the light of the decision of Indian National Shipowners Association v. Union of India 2009 -TMI - 32013 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, the said demand liable to be set aside. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant in a case related to service tax demand for the period 9-7-2004 to 16-6-2005. The tribunal cited a Supreme Court decision stating that service recipients were not liable to pay service tax before 18-4-2006. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.