Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the name of the struck off company was liable to be restored to the register of companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 in the circumstances of the case.
Analysis: The company had been struck off for non-filing of statutory returns, but the record showed that restoration was necessary to enable execution of sale deeds in favour of home buyers and commercial space purchasers. The Tribunal treated the peculiar facts, the need to avoid prejudice to purchasers, and the broader public interest as sufficient grounds to restore the company's name to the register, leaving internal corporate steps such as appointment of another director to the shareholders and the Registrar of Companies.
Conclusion: Restoration of the company was ordered and the Registrar of Companies was directed to restore its name to the Register of Companies, with directions to file pending annual returns and balance sheets and pay requisite fees.