2025 (11) TMI 1720 - AT - SEBI

Appeal against SEBI show cause notice under Section 12A and PFUTP Regulations dismissed as meritless

Setco Auto Systems Pvt. Ltd. Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India, Mumbai

The AT dismissed the appeal challenging a SEBI show cause notice arising from alleged fraudulent and manipulative transfer of funds by a wholly owned ... Seeking to provide report submitted by the NSE - show cause notice stage - Copy of the file notings - an opportunity to cross-examine the investigating officer - Fraudulent and manipulative transfer of funds - wholly owned subsidiary - violation of Section 12A(a), 12A(b), 12A(c) of the SEBI Act and Regulation 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), 4(1), 4(2)(e), 4(2)(f), 4(2)(k) and 4(2)(r) of the PFUTP Regulations - HELD THAT:- It is fairly conceded by the learned senior advocates on both sides that in similar cases this Tribunal has not interfered at this stage directing the cross-examination of the officer, who has prepared the report. The basis on which show cause notice has been issued, namely, NSE report is being made available to the appellant. So far as the file notings are concerned, in our view the same is not necessary as the appellant can file his reply. So far as the request for cross-examination of the officer who has conducted the inquiry in this case is concerned, we find no necessity in the facts of this case as the authenticated copy of the report is being made available to the appellant. No merit in the appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED 1.1 Whether, at the show cause notice stage, the noticee is entitled to be provided an authenticated copy of the stock exchange report forming the basis of SEBI's investigation and action. 1.2 Whether, at the show cause notice stage, the noticee is entitled to disclosure of SEBI's internal file notings relating to initiation of proceedings. 1.3 Whether, at the show cause notice stage, the noticee is entitled to cross-examination of the investigating officer whose inquiry and recommendation formed the basis of the show cause notice. 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue 1: Entitlement to authenticated stock exchange report Interpretation and reasoning The Tribunal noted that SEBI's investigation and the show cause notice were based on a report submitted by the stock exchange. It was pointed out that only an unsigned word document, purportedly the said report, had been provided earlier. During the hearing, SEBI's counsel stated that an authenticated report from the stock exchange along with the covering email would be made available to the appellant. The Tribunal proceeded on the basis of this assurance and treated the appellant's grievance on this aspect as addressed. Conclusions The noticee is to be furnished with an authenticated copy of the stock exchange report (with covering email) that forms the basis of SEBI's show cause notice; with this disclosure assured, no further interference of the Tribunal on this issue was warranted. Issue 2: Entitlement to SEBI's internal file notings Interpretation and reasoning The Tribunal recorded SEBI's submission that, based on the material on record, various officers in SEBI, acting in their hierarchy, examined the matter and ultimately concluded that the appellant had transferred funds to promoter entities, warranting issuance of a show cause notice. The Tribunal noted that the foundation of the show cause notice, namely the stock exchange report, was being made available. It reasoned that internal file notings reflecting intra-departmental examination and recommendations were not necessary for enabling the noticee to respond to the show cause notice. Reliance placed on another case where file notings had been provided was distinguished on the basis that it arose from peculiar facts and did not constitute a precedent. Conclusions Internal SEBI file notings pertaining to examination and decision-making leading to issuance of the show cause notice need not be disclosed at this stage, as long as the substantive basis (the stock exchange report) is made available and the noticee can file a reply. Issue 3: Entitlement to cross-examination of the investigating officer at the show cause notice stage Interpretation and reasoning The appellant sought cross-examination of the investigating officer who conducted the inquiry and recommended adjudication based on the stock exchange report. SEBI submitted that all relevant documents had been or would be made available, and that the appellant could set out its defence in reply to the show cause notice, to be adjudicated by a quasi-judicial authority in accordance with law. The Tribunal noted that, in similar cases, it had not directed cross-examination of the officer who prepared or relied on such reports at this preliminary stage. Given that an authenticated copy of the stock exchange report forming the basis of the notice was being furnished, the Tribunal found no necessity for cross-examination of the investigating officer at this juncture. Conclusions Cross-examination of the investigating officer who conducted the inquiry and recommended adjudication is not required at the show cause notice stage when the underlying report and material are made available; the noticee's defence can be properly advanced through a written reply and considered by the adjudicating authority. Overall Disposition The Tribunal held that, subject to provision of an authenticated stock exchange report with covering email, the appellant was not entitled to SEBI's internal file notings or to cross-examination of the investigating officer at the show cause notice stage. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.