Ex-gratia payout taxability and house property loss remanded for fresh review, including deduction under Section 80TTA

ITAT Pune held that the taxability of ex-gratia payment received on cessation of employment required fresh examination in light of a letter issued by the employer, noting that a coordinate bench had earlier held similar ex-gratia payments from the same employer as non-taxable. The impugned order of CIT(A)/NFAC was set aside, and the issue remanded to the Jurisdictional AO for de novo adjudication after giving the assessee proper opportunity of hearing. Issues relating to house property loss and deduction under s.80TTA were also remanded, with grounds allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

1.1 Whether the delay of 38 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal was liable to be condoned.

1.2 Whether ex-gratia payment received from the employer on cessation of employment is taxable as salary/profit in lieu of salary, or is to be treated outside the scope of section 17(3)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

1.3 Whether the additions/disallowances relating to house property loss and deduction under section 80TTA, made without effective opportunity of hearing, required reconsideration.

1.4 Whether the ground challenging initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A was maintainable at this stage.

---

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1: Condonation of delay in filing the appeal

Interpretation and reasoning

2.1 The Tribunal examined the affidavit explaining the delay of 38 days and recorded satisfaction that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the prescribed limitation period.

2.2 After hearing the Departmental Representative, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to condone the delay so that the matter could be adjudicated on merits.

Conclusions

2.3 Delay of 38 days in filing the appeal was condoned and the appeal was admitted.

---

Issue 2: Taxability of ex-gratia payment received from employer on cessation of employment

Legal framework (as discussed)

2.4 The Tribunal referred to section 17(3)(iii) of the Income-tax Act as reproduced and interpreted in a coordinate bench decision, which inclusively defines "profits in lieu of salary" to cover any amount due to or received by an assessee from any person before joining or after cessation of employment with that person.

Interpretation and reasoning

2.5 The assessee claimed the ex-gratia paid by the employer on resignation was a voluntary, non-compensatory payment not arising from any legal duty, obligation, service rules, or terms of employment, and therefore a capital receipt not taxable as salary or profit in lieu of salary.

2.6 The Tribunal relied on a coordinate bench decision involving an identical issue and the same employer, where ex-gratia paid after cessation of employment was held not taxable under section 17(3)(iii) because:

(a) The employer's letter stated that the payment was voluntary, out of appreciation, and not compensation.

(b) The tax authorities had not conducted independent enquiry to discredit or establish the letter as non-genuine.

(c) Without examining the genuineness and sanctity of such a letter, mere mechanical invocation of section 17(3)(iii) was held to be arbitrary and not legally tenable.

2.7 In the present case, the Tribunal noted that a similar letter from the same employer (Racold Thermo Private Limited) was produced as additional evidence. Following the coordinate bench view, the Tribunal found it appropriate that the Assessing Officer should re-examine the taxability of the ex-gratia payment in the light of:

(a) The contents and genuineness of the employer's letter; and

(b) The reasoning and conclusions laid down in the earlier coordinate bench decision.

2.8 The Tribunal also directed that reasonable opportunity of hearing be afforded to the assessee, thereby addressing the grievance of lack of adequate opportunity at earlier stages.

Conclusions

2.9 The impugned order of the first appellate authority on the issue of taxability of ex-gratia payment was set aside.

2.10 The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer to decide afresh, in the light of the employer's letter and the coordinate bench decision, after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

2.11 Grounds relating to addition of ex-gratia as undisclosed salary were allowed for statistical purposes.

---

Issue 3: Disallowance of house property loss and deduction under section 80TTA; adequacy of opportunity

Interpretation and reasoning

2.12 The additions in dispute comprised disallowance of house property loss and disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80TTA.

2.13 It was noted that the first appellate authority had dismissed the appeal in the assessee's absence, without adjudicating these issues on merits, thereby giving rise to grievance regarding lack of reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard.

2.14 To cure the deficiency in opportunity and to ensure a proper examination of facts and merits, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to remit these issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration with due hearing.

Conclusions

2.15 Issues relating to house property loss and deduction under section 80TTA were remanded to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing.

2.16 The grounds on these issues were allowed for statistical purposes.

---

Issue 4: Challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A

Interpretation and reasoning

2.17 The assessee challenged the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A in the present appeal against the quantum assessment.

2.18 The Tribunal considered that only initiation of penalty proceedings was in existence and no penalty order under section 270A had yet been passed, rendering the ground premature.

Conclusions

2.19 The ground challenging initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A was held to be premature and was dismissed.

---