Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to have the belatedly produced and verified Form F accepted for the branch transfer claim of Rs. 6,29,59,345/- and whether the impugned rejection required interference.
Analysis: The dispute was confined to the non-production of the original Form F for one remaining transaction block, although the form was later produced before the Court and verified by the respondent authority. The Court noted that the matter had remained pending for a long period and that the branch transfer nature of the transaction was not disputed. In these circumstances, and in view of the respondent's verification of the form, the Court accepted the petitioner's request to the limited extent of directing consideration of the produced Form F, while recording that the remaining unreconciled transactions would still be payable in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The belatedly produced Form F was directed to be considered for the specified amount, and the petitioner obtained limited relief.