Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of alleged on-money received on sale of land could be sustained on the basis of a WhatsApp chat found from the mobile phone of a third party, without corroborative material linking the assessee to any extra consideration.
Analysis: The addition arose from proceedings under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the Revenue relied primarily on a WhatsApp chat recovered during search under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 from a person unconnected with the assessee. The chat was dated about one year after the actual sale, the sender was neither examined nor confronted, no cross-examination was afforded, and no independent inquiry, comparable instance, cash trail, or material from the purchaser was brought on record to show receipt of excess consideration. The alleged market value was thus inferred only by presumption from a third-party message, without corroboration sufficient to displace the recorded sale consideration.
Conclusion: The addition on account of alleged on-money was unsustainable and was rightly deleted; the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: An addition for alleged undisclosed sale consideration cannot rest solely on an uncorroborated third-party electronic communication, especially when it is temporally disconnected from the transaction and no material establishes nexus, actual payment, or receipt of on-money.