Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether laying of pipelines for the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board was a taxable service under the head of Commercial or Industrial Construction Service, so as to attract service tax.
Analysis: Liability under the relevant service tax entry arose only if the pipeline or conduit was used, or was to be used, primarily for commerce or industry, and the service provider was a commercial concern. The Board was constituted under a statute to develop and regulate water supply and sewerage services in the State. Its functions showed that supplying water to the public and local bodies was a public utility activity, not a primary commercial venture. The water was supplied at subsidised rates, and the operating cost itself was not recovered. The Board circular also clarified that canal systems built by the Government or under Government projects were not chargeable as commercial construction where they were not part of a commercial activity.
Conclusion: The pipeline work was not used for commerce or industry, and the service rendered by the appellant did not fall within Commercial or Industrial Construction Service. Service tax was therefore not leviable.