Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order passed under Section 73 of the GST regime and the consequent appellate order dismissing the appeal as time-barred could be sustained when no effective opportunity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner.
Analysis: The record showed issuance of notice with dates for reply and personal hearing, but the petitioner was not granted a further opportunity before the order dated 15.02.2025 was passed. The Court found the matter covered by prior coordinate bench authority and held that the original order suffered from violation of natural justice and was therefore non est in law. The appellate order dated 29.09.2025, being consequential, could not survive.
Conclusion: The orders dated 15.02.2025 and 29.09.2025 were quashed and set aside, and the authorities were directed to grant another opportunity of hearing and thereafter pass a fresh order in accordance with law.