Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a tax demand under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could be sustained against a corporate debtor after it had been sold in liquidation as a going concern and confirmed by the National Company Law Tribunal.
Analysis: A corporate debtor sold in liquidation as a going concern is treated on a clean-state basis. Past dues that do not survive the insolvency process cannot be recovered independently of the insolvency regime. The distribution of liabilities is governed by the waterfall mechanism under Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the buyer of the corporate debtor cannot be saddled with pre-sale dues outside that framework. The Court followed its earlier view that sale as a going concern is akin to a de-facto corporate insolvency resolution process for this purpose.
Conclusion: The tax proceeding for the relevant period could not have been initiated against the corporate debtor after the going-concern sale, and the demand order was liable to be quashed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the impugned tax order was set aside on the ground that pre-sale liabilities stood of the recoverable claims after sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a corporate debtor is sold in liquidation as a going concern on a clean-state basis, pre-sale statutory dues cannot be separately enforced against it and must yield to the insolvency distribution framework.