Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the winding-up proceedings pending before the High Court were liable to be transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal in the facts of the case.
Analysis: The transfer framework under the Companies Act, 2013 as amended by the insolvency legislation and the related transfer rules required pending winding-up matters to move to the Tribunal, save where the proceeding had reached an irreversible stage. The controlling test was whether any actual sale of assets had taken place or whether the process had advanced so far that it would be impossible to set the clock back. The earlier co-ordinate bench decision was confined to its own facts and did not lay down a general exception overriding the Supreme Court's ratio. On the admitted facts, a transfer application was on record and the assets of the company in liquidation had not yet been sold, so no irreversible step had been shown.
Conclusion: The winding-up proceedings were required to be transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal. The appellant's separate claim was left open to be pursued before the appropriate authority in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Pending winding-up proceedings are mandatorily transferable to the Tribunal unless the matter has progressed to an irreversible stage, such as an actual sale of assets, where restoring the pre-transfer position would be impossible.