Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim for accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was barred by limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as made applicable to service tax.
Analysis: The refund claim arose under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification No. 05/2006-CE (NT) dated 14.03.2006. The claim had been rejected as time-barred, and the Tribunal found that refund claims of this nature remain governed by the limitation under Section 11B unless a different statutory provision excludes such application. It further held that Section 11B applies to service tax by virtue of Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Conclusion: The refund claim was barred by limitation and the rejection of refund was upheld.