Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clearances made by a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking to DFRC holders against advance release orders were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 125/84-C.E., and consequently whether the demand of duty could be sustained.
Analysis: Notification No. 125/84-C.E. exempts excisable goods produced or manufactured in a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking from duty under Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, but denies the exemption where the goods are allowed to be sold in India. The clearances in question were made to DFRC holders and were not covered by the permission of the Development Commissioner. Such clearances were therefore treated as goods not allowed to be sold in India. The Tribunal also noted that the same view had already been taken in the earlier decision on identical clearances and that supplies to DFRC holders are regarded as deemed exports under the policy.
Conclusion: The clearances were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 125/84-C.E., and the duty demand was not sustainable. The assessee's appeal succeeded and the revenue's appeal failed.