Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in view of the twin conditions under Section 45, the material collected during investigation, and the prolonged custody with no near prospect of conclusion of trial.
Analysis: The allegations and investigation materials indicated that the petitioner was associated with the principal accused, managed the affairs of the fake call centre, and that proceeds of crime were allegedly credited to the petitioner and his family members' accounts. On that basis, the statutory bar under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was considered inapplicable only if the Court could be satisfied that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the petitioner was not guilty and would not commit any offence while on bail. At the same time, the case involved a large number of witnesses and voluminous documents, the trial had not yet commenced, and the petitioner had already remained in custody for a substantial period. The right to speedy trial was treated as a material factor in assessing whether continued incarceration was justified.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner, as the Court found that continued detention was unwarranted in the circumstances despite the seriousness of the allegations.
Ratio Decidendi: In a PMLA bail matter, where the trial is not likely to conclude in the near future and the custody has become prolonged, the twin conditions under Section 45 may be relaxed if the overall circumstances justify conditional liberty.