Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether blocking of input tax credit under Rule 86A of the U.P.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 was valid when the competent authority had not recorded reasons to believe in writing based on relevant material.
Analysis: The blocking of input tax credit is permissible only when the statutory precondition of reasons to believe, recorded in writing, is satisfied by the competent authority. The material relied upon must have a rational nexus with the belief formed, and there must be an application of mind to the facts before the authority. A generic or non-specific communication, without any order or recorded reasons showing why the assessee's credit was liable to be blocked, does not satisfy the mandatory requirement. Mere suspicion or an ex parte investigation report, without more, is insufficient to justify such action.
Conclusion: The blocking of input tax credit was invalid and was set aside. The authority was directed to act only in accordance with law if it wished to proceed afresh.