Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether processing filament yarn or organic polymers into textured yarn amounted to manufacture of filament yarn for the purpose of availing concessional excise duty under Notification No. 29/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004.
Analysis: The exemption was available to filament yarns procured from outside and subjected to any process by a manufacturer lacking facilities for the manufacture of filament yarns of Chapter 54. On the facts found, the appellant purchased filament yarn or organic polymers and processed them into textured yarn. That activity did not answer the description of manufacture of filament yarn within the notification. The claimed concessional rate was therefore unavailable.
Conclusion: The benefit of concessional excise duty was not admissible and the challenge to the tribunal orders failed.